 | 90 Confusion of Goods |
| 90I Nature and Effect |
| 90k1 k. Application of Doctrine in General. |
 Execution purchaser of cattle branded "U Y-Y" held entitled to all "U Y-Y" cattle, as against prior execution purchaser of "Y-Y" cattle in same herd, where prior purchaser, being entitled to some "U Y-Y" cattle, namely, increase of "Y-Y" cattle, was responsible for commingling.
Hagan v. Cosper, 292 P. 1020 (1930)
About The West Headnote of the Day
Written by West attorney editors and classified within the exclusive West Key Number System®, West headnotes summarize points of law in judicial rulings. Every day, we bring you a West headnote that's especially humorous, profound or interesting. IMPORTANT: We offer the West Headnote of the Day as a diversion; the point of law it contains may no longer be good law. Please verify using KeyCite® on Westlaw. For Westlaw research assistance or questions, please call 1-800-207-9378.
Other Helpful Links: Westlaw® | FindLaw® | Thomson West | lawschool.westlaw.com
|
